{"id":3868,"date":"2023-08-03T22:08:40","date_gmt":"2023-08-03T20:08:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.bestoffer.al\/?p=3868"},"modified":"2026-10-05T16:35:12","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T14:35:12","slug":"punesimi-i-punetoreve-klandestine-nga-punedhenesi-qe-te-denohet-duhet-prova-e-plote-e-punesimit-efektiv-te-punetorit-te-parregullt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.bestoffer.al\/sq\/punesimi-i-punetoreve-klandestine-nga-punedhenesi-qe-te-denohet-duhet-prova-e-plote-e-punesimit-efektiv-te-punetorit-te-parregullt\/","title":{"rendered":"Pun\u00ebsimi i pun\u00ebtor\u00ebve klandestin\u00eb"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pun\u00ebsimi i pun\u00ebtor\u00ebve klandestin\u00eb: q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi t\u00eb d\u00ebnohet, duhet prova e plot\u00eb e pun\u00ebsimit efektiv t\u00eb pun\u00ebtorit t\u00eb parregullt.<\/h2>\n

Gjykata e Milanos, duke gjykuar nj\u00eb t\u00eb pandehur q\u00eb akuzohej p\u00ebr krimin e d\u00ebnuar nga neni 22, paragrafi 12, TUI, identifikon element\u00ebt p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes. Le t\u00eb shohim \u00e7far\u00eb parashikon art. 22, paragrafi 12, TUI<\/a> m\u00eb n\u00eb detaj:<\/p>\n

12. Pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi q\u00eb pun\u00ebson pun\u00ebtor\u00eb t\u00eb huaj pa lejen e q\u00ebndrimit t\u00eb parashikuar nga ky nen, ose t\u00eb cilit i ka skaduar leja dhe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar rinovimi, \u00ebsht\u00eb revokuar ose anulluar, brenda kushteve t\u00eb ligjit, d\u00ebnohet me burgim nga gjasht\u00eb muaj deri n\u00eb tre vjet dhe me gjob\u00eb 5000 euro p\u00ebr \u00e7do pun\u00ebtor t\u00eb pun\u00ebsuar.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

N\u00eb fakt, i pandehuri akuzohej se kishte pun\u00ebsuar nj\u00eb person pa leje q\u00ebndrimi n\u00eb kompanin\u00eb e tij. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs, megjithat\u00eb, trupi gjykues sqaroi se \u201cn\u00eb rastin konkret, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur asnj\u00eb prov\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje me pun\u00ebsimin efektiv n\u00eb firm\u00ebn e t\u00eb pandehurit […] Nuk rezulton se i akuzuari ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb dijeni t\u00eb veprimtaris\u00eb s\u00eb pun\u00ebtorit […]. Prandaj, asgj\u00eb nga ajo q\u00eb propozohet n\u00eb akuz\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuar<\/em>\u201d.
\nP\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, rrethanat e raportuara nga zyra jon\u00eb n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb hetimit ishin vendimtare: i huaji i parregullt, n\u00eb fakt, u identifikua nga forcat e rendit jo n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs, por n\u00eb nj\u00eb automjet pa stem\u00ebn e kompanis\u00eb, s\u00eb bashku me nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr person, i rregullt n\u00eb territorin komb\u00ebtar dhe i pun\u00ebsuar nga i pandehuri, klient i zyr\u00ebs. N\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb hetimeve t\u00eb m\u00ebpasshme, rezultoi se, mes dy personave t\u00eb ndaluar n\u00eb automjet, kishte nj\u00eb lidhje familjare dhe i huaji i parregullt deklaroi se kishte marr\u00eb nj\u00eb shum\u00eb eurosh dorazi direkt nga v\u00ebllai i tij p\u00ebr dit\u00ebn e pun\u00ebs q\u00eb sapo kishte p\u00ebrfunduar.<\/p>\n

Gjykata, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb saj\u00ebn tez\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb mbrojtjes son\u00eb, e shpalli t\u00eb pafajsh\u00ebm t\u00eb akuzuarin n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 530 c.p.p. sepse fakti nuk ekziston.<\/h3>\n

Vendimi i Gjykat\u00ebs \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bisedat n\u00eb WhatsApp, mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren si prov\u00eb n\u00eb gjyq?<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n